The complainant alleged that the length of the extension of time Library and Archives Canada (LAC) took under subsection 9(1) of the Access to Information Act to respond to an access request was unreasonable. The access request was for any records relating to any and all access to information requests received by LAC regarding Project Anecdote. The complaint falls under paragraph 30(1)(c) of the Act.

LAC claimed a 1,095-day extension of time under paragraphs 9(1)(a) and (b) to complete the processing of the request. If the extension were valid, the time limit for the response would be June 20, 2025.

During the investigation, LAC showed that it met all the requirements of paragraphs 9(1)(a) and (b), in particular that the calculation of the time extension was sufficiently logical and supportable, or that providing access to the records within any materially lesser period of time than the one asserted would unreasonably interfere with its operations and that the consultations could not reasonably be completed within 30 days.

The Office of the Information Commissioner concludes that LAC showed that it met all the requirements of paragraph 9(1)(a) and (b). Therefore, the extension is valid and the due date to respond to the access request remains June 20, 2025.

The complaint is not well founded.