Timeframe for submitting a complaint
Under section 31 of the Access to Information Act, complainants have 60 calendar days to submit a complaint.
Section 31 uses the word “shall,” which means “must”—that is, it is mandatory for complainants to submit their complaints on or before the 60-day time limit. When they do not, the Information Commissioner has no jurisdiction to investigate the complaint and advises complainants that it is inadmissible.
Complainants’ responsibilities
Complainants alone are responsible for submitting their complaints on time and for providing all the necessary details, including all relevant documents, using the complaint form.
Individuals making access requests are responsible for ensuring they are aware of the time limits the Act sets for institutions to respond to requests (see, When and how institutions are to respond to access requests) and for individuals to submit complaints.
Individuals should also become familiar with sections 30 and 31 of the Act and the guidelines below. They should also keep records of the following dates, starting from when they file their requests:
- the date they made each access request
- when 30 calendar days after that date falls so they know when to expect a response to their access request or a notice related to it (such as a notice about an extension of time)
- the date they receive any response or notice from the institution (that is, the date it arrives in their inbox or in the mail, not the date they open it)
- the expiration date of any extension of time the institution claims
- any other dates related to the processing of and response to their access request.
Circumstance | When the 60-day period starts |
|---|---|
| Complainant receives a notice under section 7 that the institution refuses to grant access to part or all of the requested records | The day after the complainant receives the notice |
| Complainant is given access to part or all of the requested records | The day after the complainant is given access to some or all of the records |
| In any other case | The day after the complainant becomes aware that grounds for complaint exist Examples of when the 60-day period starts
More information: Federal Court decision on when 60-day period begins |
Important reminders for individuals considering complaining that they did not receive a response to their access request by the 30-day or extended time limit
| |
How does the OIC determine when the 60-day period begins?
The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) first reviews the complaint to determine under which of the three circumstances each allegation falls (notice, records or “in any other case”; see the table above) and, therefore, when the 60-day period began in each case.
The OIC may consult various documents from the complainant and institution to determine the date the 60-day period began. These documents could include the following: access request, institution’s acknowledgement that it received the request, response or notice the institution sent to the complainant, documentation from the institution confirming the date documents were sent and delivered (e.g. postmarks, time stamps) and any documents the complainant has relating to the request, including when any notice or response was received.
This is why it is important for institutions to record when they respond to access requests and give notices under section 7, section 8 and subsection 9(1), and to indicate the date on all correspondence. It is also important for complainants to keep on file any emails or other written correspondence they receive from the institution about their access request.
In some circumstances, it may be necessary for the OIC to communicate with the complainant to confirm exactly when a notice or records were received (e.g. the precise date when a notice or records arrived in the complainant’s inbox). The OIC may also need to confirm when the complainant otherwise became aware that grounds for complaint exist in order to determine when the 60-day period began.
Points the OIC considers when calculating the 60-day time limit
- The 60 days are consecutive calendar days, starting from the day after the complainant receives the notice or records, or the day after the requester learns grounds for complaint exist.
- When Day 60 is a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, it moves to the next business day.
How does the OIC determine when a complaint is submitted?
The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) needs a complaint form containing all the necessary details, including relevant documents, so it can determine whether the complaint has been submitted on time, is not premature and falls within the Information Commissioner’s mandate. When a complainant does not provide enough information, the OIC may decide the complaint is inadmissible, even when it was submitted by the 60-day time limit.
Points the OIC considers when determining when the complaint was submitted
- When the complaint is submitted online or by email, the OIC considers the date the complaint was submitted to be the day the form was submitted online or the email was sent.
- When the complaint is submitted by mail, the OIC considers the date the complaint was submitted to be the date on the postmark.
May the Information Commissioner extend the time limit for submitting a complaint?
No. The Commissioner has no power under the Access to Information Act to extend the 60-day time limit.
For that reason, once the 60-day period begins, the Office of the Information Commissioner may not extend the time limit for any reason, including the following:
- complainant is or was ill, busy or on vacation
- complainant waited until the institution resumed processing the access request after being told that their request was put “on hold,” except when the Commissioner’s approval to decline to act on an access request was sought
- complainant attempted to negotiate with the institution to get the response to their access request or to modify the content of the response.
Complainants must be mindful that, once the 60-day period begins, they should submit their complaint as soon as possible to ensure they meet the time limit.
Are there situations when the Information Commissioner would accept a complaint after the 60-day deadline?
No. The Access to Information Act does not allow the Commissioner to accept complaints submitted after the 60-day deadline.
For that reason, once the 60-day period begins, the Office of the Information Commissioner may not extend the time limit for any reason, including the following:
- complainant is or was ill, busy or on vacation
- complainant waited until the institution resumed processing the access request after being told that their request was put “on hold,” except when the Commissioner’s approval to decline to act on an access request was sought
- complainant attempted to negotiate with the institution to get or change the response to their access request.
Complainants must be mindful that, once the 60-day period begins, they should submit their complaint as soon as possible to ensure they meet the time limit.
What happens when a complainant submits a complaint after the 60-day time limit?
When the Information Commissioner determines that a complainant submitted a complaint after the 60-day time limit, the Office of the Information Commissioner notifies the complainant in writing that the complaint is inadmissible and that the matter is closed.