Decisions

The Information Commissioner publishes the final reports on her investigations on this website when she deems them to be of value in providing guidance to both institutions and complainants.

The Office of the Information Commissioner has established the Decisions Database to enable users to search final reports and other decisions, which outline the reasons and principles behind the Commissioner’s decisions and filter them using a number of criteria.

This database is updated regularly and continues to grow as more final reports, decisions and orders are added. The dates indicated refer to the date on which the decision was rendered.

Institutions are legally obliged to abide by an order from the Commissioner unless they apply to the Federal Court for a review of the matter that is the subject of the order. The Access to Information Act does not provide any other alternative to complying with the order. 

To learn more about the Information Commissioner’s orders, please visit our Frequently asked questions.

Other Corporate publications are available on the website.

Filters
Decision Type

699 decisions found

Jul 8
2024

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-04004

Institution
Library and Archives Canada
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2021-09696
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a complete response to the access request on the 72nd business day following the date of the final report.
Read more
Jul 2
2024

Health Canada (Re), 2024 OIC 36

Institution
Health Canada
Section of the Act
30(1)(a)
Decision Type
Order
Final report
Summary

The complainant alleged that Health Canada did not respond to an access request within the 30-day period set out in section 7 of the Access to Information Act. The request was for internal and external records referenced in a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement for the Regulations Amending the Tobacco Products Regulations. The allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a) of the Act.

During the investigation, the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) was advised that 20,250 pages of responsive records were received. The OIC noted that information management deficiencies had resulted in a significant delay in the processing of the request. In addition, consultations within Health Canada, with other government departments, as well as with a number of third parties, would be required.

Heath Canada committed to responding to the request by July 17, 2030.

Considering the amount of time that had already passed without significant progress in processing this request and the overly long approval timeline, the proposed response date was found to be unreasonable. The Information Commissioner ordered the Minister of Health to provide a complete response to the access request no later than April 7, 2026.

Health Canada gave notice to the Commissioner that it would implement the order.

The complaint is well founded.

Read more
Jul 2
2024

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-02060

Institution
Library and Archives Canada
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2020-09914
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a complete response to the access request no later than September 30, 2024
Read more
Jul 2
2024

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-04003

Institution
Library and Archives Canada
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2021-09694
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a complete response to the access request no later than October 1st, 2024
Read more
Jul 2
2024

Canada Revenue Agency, 5823-03725

Institution
Canada Revenue Agency
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2023-172036
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a complete response to the access request no later than October 14, 2024.
Read more
Jun 27
2024

Transport Canada, 5823-03193

Institution
Transport Canada
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2023-00348
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a complete response to the access request no later than January 30, 2025.
Read more
Jun 27
2024

Canada Revenue Agency, 5823-01787

Institution
Canada Revenue Agency
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2022-159629
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a response by June 25, 2024.
Read more
Jun 25
2024

National defence (Re), 2024 OIC 34

Institution
National Defence
Section of the Act
19(1)
30(1)(a)
Decision Type
Recommendation
Final report
Summary

The complainant alleged that National Defence (DND) improperly withheld information under subsection 19(1) (personal information) of the Access to Information Act and did not conduct a reasonable search when responding to an access request. The request was for records related to the funding of a medical residency training program for a specified period. The allegations fall within paragraph 30(1)(a) of the Act.

DND conceded that it had not properly applied subsection 19(1) in all instances it was applied, and issued a supplementary disclosure. The Information Commissioner was satisfied that the remaining withheld information met the requirements of the exemption.

During the investigation, DND conducted additional searches and found additional records. The Information Commissioner concluded that DND did not conduct a reasonable search when it initially responded to the request. Also, the investigation determined that more records responsive to the request should have existed but, for various reasons, had not been retained by DND. The Information Commissioner further concluded that DND failed to pursue inquiries to ensure all responsive records were located at the time it processed the request.

The Commissioner recommended that DND ensure that its employees receive training and support on information management responsibilities and procedures, and are instructed to comply with those responsibilities. DND gave notice to the Commissioner that it would be implementing the recommendations and shared its plan to improve practices regarding records management.

The complaint is well founded.

Read more
Jun 21
2024

Global Affairs Canada, 5823-00645

Institution
Global Affairs Canada
Section of the Act
7
Decision Type
Delay in responding to a request
Order
Institution file #
A-2022-03914
Did the institution give notice it would implement the order?
Yes
Summary
Order: provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the receipt of my final report.
Read more
Jun 21
2024

Environment and Climate Change Canada, (Re), 2024 OIC 33

Institution
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Section of the Act
30(1)(a)
Decision Type
Recommendation
Order
Final report
Summary

The complainant alleged that Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) did not respond within the extended period under subsection 9(1) of the Access to Information Act to an access request. The request was for records related to meetings and the lobbying efforts of the Pathways Alliance Inc., from January 14, 2023, to May 4, 2023. The allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a) of the Act.

The investigation determined that ECCC did not respond to the access request when the time extension expired. The delay was caused by a lack of responsiveness from two offices of primary interest (OPIs).

The Information Commissioner ordered that ECCC provide a response to the access request no later than August 7, 2024. She also recommended that the Minister of Environment develop proper processes and procedures to ensure that ECCC OPIs will abide by their responsibilities to provide responsive records in a timely fashion to ECCC’s ATIP Office and that he develop performance indicators to hold senior officials accountable for delays in providing responsive records to ECCC’s ATIP Office.

ECCC gave notice to the Commissioner that it would be implementing the order and detailed the steps it is taking to implement the recommendations.

The complaint is well founded.

Read more
Date modified:
Submit a complaint